The Task
The second step of the design process focused on researching functions and concepts. After determining our problem and solution, we had to become more specific with our product. We had to list the functions of the products and possible ways to accomplish these functions. An example is a volume and preamp knob for the amplification function. We also had to sketch out designs. The previous website update focuses on the sketches more, but it will still be mentioned here.
Padlet Revisited
The first step was to brainstorm completely different products that could be used to solve other problems in the same market. This was both an assignment and a suggestion from our mentor. In the end, we decided to continue our EQ product, but there were some interesting products brainstormed, including a theater with revolutionary acoustics.
|
Coggle
Coggle is a software that allows the creation of flowcharts. We used this software to build a flowchart of our product's functions. We subdivided our product into four functions:
Amplification - This refers to the boosting of voltage in order to make the audio audible. Equalization - Equalization refers to the balancing of audio. Amplification is needed before equalization in order for it to work. Portability - The portability of our product refers to its shape and weight. Being able to move it around easily is an essential part of the product. Adaptability - Adaptability refers to what ports it could plug into. USB, MIDI, XLR, quarter inch, and Apple connectors are examples. |
Classification Schemes
After determining our four functions, we had to come up with concepts that could satisfy these functions. For instance, we had to think of four unique ways to equalize audio. We created the first one on September 11, received teacher and mentor feedback. and revised it. The final version was released September 16.
First Version
|
Revised Version
|
Design Selection
The next assignment was to create three possible designs from our classification schemes. These would be created via choosing one concept from each row and putting them together in sketches. This was the reason for the drawing course our teacher assigned us. Each color is associated with a different design in the design selection document.
The Three Designs
The three designs we created were analyzed, sketched, and ranked.
Design 1: Preamp fader, parametric EQ, carrying case, quarter inch adapter
The main characteristic of the first design is the parametric EQ function. Parametric EQ allows complete control over equalization and amplification. However, a carrying case is bulky and parametric EQ doesn't appeal to our target audience of amateur musicians. |
Design 2: Volume fader, tilt EQ, cylinder shape, XLR connector
The tilt EQ, XLR connector, and cylindrical shape are extremely close to our desired product. This design appeals to the amateur musician for its simplicity. However, the volume fader isn't the best choice because it won't fit on a cylinder and is awkward to control. |
Design 3: Volume knob, EQ map, compact overall structure, USB adapter
The compact structure and USB adapter provide a portable and adaptable product that is useful to any musician. A knob is more effective than a fader as well. However, an EQ map makes little sense, especially due to its fragile structure and large size on a small object that is meant to be carried around. |
Reflection
In this continued state of confusion and uncertainty, my group worked hard and managed to complete step 2 and its challenges and tasks. Through determination and perseverance, we finished a drawing course and designed products from our classification schemes. One of my strengths was my efficiency. There was significantly more work in this step than step 1, with the drawing course taking up a lot of time. However, we were able to finish this assignment in record time, allocating time for other assignments. My other strength was my critical thinking skills. Most work involved conceptualizing solutions and ways to perform functions and combining components into drawings. I had to think hard about many possibilities and problems, and being able to balance this was an excellent skill to develop.
With these strengths came weaknesses. One weakness I had was my contribution to the classification schemes. One of my teammates focused most of their energy on the document and I did very little to assist. Our teammate was certainly under a lot of pressure and I should've helped alleviate some of that pressure. This was a similar issue that I failed to solve in the previous step. This weakness is the one I plan to work on the most. Another weakness I had was my minimal contribution to the Coggle. While it was true I brainstormed some ideas, my teammates did much more work in creating the flowchart on the Coggle. I could've and should've participated more.
Despite these weaknesses, I still worked very hard and pulled through despite the current status quo. Ampliteam has excellent chemistry, which is needed for the future steps. As we continue to move forward, I am still excited for the future of the Capstone Project and the potential of our product.
With these strengths came weaknesses. One weakness I had was my contribution to the classification schemes. One of my teammates focused most of their energy on the document and I did very little to assist. Our teammate was certainly under a lot of pressure and I should've helped alleviate some of that pressure. This was a similar issue that I failed to solve in the previous step. This weakness is the one I plan to work on the most. Another weakness I had was my minimal contribution to the Coggle. While it was true I brainstormed some ideas, my teammates did much more work in creating the flowchart on the Coggle. I could've and should've participated more.
Despite these weaknesses, I still worked very hard and pulled through despite the current status quo. Ampliteam has excellent chemistry, which is needed for the future steps. As we continue to move forward, I am still excited for the future of the Capstone Project and the potential of our product.